Medical literature review

To be honest, i was excited to have this opportunity to examine the literature in depth and to create something useful out of it. Research - browse by subject and click the tabs for articles, posters, and slides - which searches a limited number of biology and medical society meetings/conferences.

How to write a medical literature review

Photo courtesy of matthew i undertook the task of writing a scientific literature review article last year, i had hoped that a google search would reveal a handful of how-to pages thoughtfully created by veterans of this particular writing process. Meta-analyses (quantitative systematic reviews) seek to answer a focused clinical question, using rigorous statistical analysis of pooled research studies.

It should touch on one or more of the following subtopics: etiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation (signs and symptoms), diagnostic evaluation (history, physical examination, laboratory evaluation, and diagnostic imaging), differential diagnosis, treatment (goals, medical/surgical therapy, laboratory testing, patient education, and follow-up), prognosis, prevention, and future review will be comprehensive and balanced if it acknowledges controversies, unresolved questions, recent developments, other viewpoints, and any apparent conflicts of interest or instances of bias that might affect the strength of the evidence presented. A graduate of rush medical college, chicago, she completed a residency in family medicine at the university of california, san diego, medical c.

In the end, i finished by the deadline (well, plus one two-week extension the editor agreed to grant me) and was very happy with the product and with all i had learned about caspase substrates, about the scientific literature and about the review-writing process. Find places to write where you can concentrate, and take breaks often to stretch, get a snack or even step outside for a few minutes.

One of the most painful things that can happen is to spend days reading and writing about a topic only to notice later that there’s a section of another review article that explores the same area, references the same set of papers and comes to the same conclusions. My adviser is a busy guy, with a lot of papers and grants to work on, so i knew that by “co-author” he meant that i would be the main researcher and writer, getting mostly broad, guiding suggestions from him.

You should also search other subject specific databases that index the literature in your field. Disease-oriented evidenceevaluating the literaturelevels of evidenceformat of the reviewchecklist for an evidence-based clinical review articlereferencestraditional clinical review articles, also known as updates, differ from systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Disease-oriented evidenceevaluating the literaturelevels of evidenceformat of the reviewchecklist for an evidence-based clinical review articlereferencesarticle selectionsearching the literaturepatient-oriented vs. Such evidence-based updates provide readers with powerful summaries and sound clinical this article, we present guidelines for writing an evidence-based clinical review article, especially one designed for continuing medical education (cme) and incorporating cme objectives into its format.

State how the literature search was done and include several sources of evidence-based reviews, such as the cochrane collaboration, bmj's clinical evidence, or the inforetriever web site. Printers, washington l literature databases to atic reviews: medical literature databases to of literature review & ol and l literature databases to selection and extraction/coding/study characteristics/ing the quality/risk of citations using to document your literature should always document how you have searched each database, what keywords or index terms were used, the date on which the search was performed, how many results you retrieved, and if you use refworks to deduplicate results record how many were removed as duplicates and the final number of discrete studies you subjected to your first sift through of study selection.

The websites of the mcmaster university health information research unit, and the university of york centre for reviews and dissemination intertasc information specialists' sub-group, for any pre-existing validated database search filters that have been shown to accurately identify studies of the topic of the medline (or pubmed), preferably using a peer reviewed search strategy per protocol and apply any relevant methodology embase (or scopus) and the cochrane central trials register using appropriately reformatted search versions for those databases, and any other online a refworks database into which will be imported the citation plus abstract of each study identified through a database or website search or journal article identified by hand searching. You may need to reformat your search keywords but always follow your search might consider searching one or more of the following websites depending on your topic: - also contains study population characteristics and results data of fda regulated drugs and medical devices in nih funded studies produced after january 18,  - searchable index of clinical trials, guidelines,and regulatory t controlled an clinical trials e - tracks outcome switching in clinical ials - aims to match published trials with the underlying data where this is publicly available in an open literature resources:Wonder - cdc data and - search federal government york academy of medicine (nyam) grey literature report (covers grey literature from 1999-2016.

A limited set of conference proceedings databases include the following:Web of science - click all databases and select core collection - under more settings limit to the conference proceedings citation index (cpci) - searches a limited set of conferences on science, social science and humanities from - limit document type to conference paper or conference st - limit search results to conference papers &/or proceedings under advanced central proceedings - searches a limited set of biomedical conference proceedings, including bioinformatics, genetics, medical students, and data visualization. Shaughnessy and slawson's guide for writers of clinical review articles includes a section on information and validity traps to avoid.

He or she is your target audience and will let you know if there are sections that need to be revised for crawford (rd@) is a graduate student at the university of california, san ent's messagehill newsmember updatetabor award winnersbilly hudsonsynthetic biologywriting a reviewflu shotscience and megenomes for model organismslipid newsmcp newsjlr newsjbc newseducationcareer insightsgifts for geeksnew jbc sitesnih newsplasmids & empty vectorsaxelrod obituaryresearch spotlightblog reviewgraduation survey resultsoh, how we love odes! Allowing a website to create a cookie does not give that or any other site access to of your computer, and only the site that created the cookie can read washington l literature databases to atic reviews: medical literature databases to of literature review & ol and l literature databases to selection and extraction/coding/study characteristics/ing the quality/risk of citations using to document your literature should always document how you have searched each database, what keywords or index terms were used, the date on which the search was performed, how many results you retrieved, and if you use refworks to deduplicate results record how many were removed as duplicates and the final number of discrete studies you subjected to your first sift through of study selection.

Perform a custom google search of academic open access research ute of medicine family wood johnson foundation health and medical care data k memorial fund reports and issue tations and theses:Proquest dissertations and theses ked digital library of theses and access theses and at and change content: from any content to thesis/ence proceedings:Most conference proceedings are difficult to find because they may or may not be published. Methodsthe methods section should briefly indicate how the literature search was conducted and what major sources of evidence were used.

Systematic reviews that analyze multiple rcts are good sources for determining ratings of ncesthe references should include the most current and important sources of support for key statements (i. S pd, stewart gb, pullin as (2006) are review articles a reliable source of evidence to support conservation and environmental management?

Disease-oriented evidenceevaluating the literaturelevels of evidenceformat of the reviewchecklist for an evidence-based clinical review articlereferencesevaluate the strength and validity of the literature that supports the discussion (see the following section, levels of evidence). This was easy in my case, because my adviser and i both preferred that i be the main researcher and writer and that he act as a consultant on high-level issues.

Here is an example of how to document a literature search on an excel spreadsheet, this example records a search of the hematology literature for articles about sickle cell disease. Use primary sources (original research, rcts, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews) as the basis for determining the level of evidence.

Home

Sitemap