Research tells a story and the existing literature helps us identify where we are in the story currently. For example, a study of the performance of a clinical team working in gerontology might involve reading literature within medicine; nursing; other allied healthcare specialties; psychology; and sociology; as well as perhaps healthcare policy; and patients’ experiences of healthcare.
The dissertation journey ebook to understand the challenges dissertation writers face and strategies for overcoming g a literature an academic writer, you are expected to provide an analytical overview of the significant literature published on your topic. British journal of nursing, 17(1), aking a structured literature review or structuring a literature review: tales from the ge, a.
The process of conducting and reporting your literature review can help you clarify your own thoughts about your study. Dissertation literature review guide - dissertation literature review introduction - dissertation literature review tips - literature review step by step - dissertation literature review help - dissertation literature review how-to - guide writing dissertation literature review - dissertation literature review writing.
M4 f56 ture reviews made easy: a quick guide to number: main collection - pn98. It is a good idea to decide your strategy on this, rather than drifting into one or the other.
If you are required to record and present your search strategy, you may be able to include the technical details of the search strategy as an appendix to your rism is regarded as a serious offence by all universities, and you need to make sure that you do not, even accidentally, commit rism is the using of someone else’s words or ideas, and passing them off as your own. These gaps will be important for you to address as you plan and write your fy relationships among studies: note relationships among studies, such as which studies were landmark ones that led to subsequent studies in the same area.
If your audience knows less than you do on the topic, your purpose is instructional. It is important to keep the focus on your study, rather than on the literature (wellington 2005).
You will need to experiment with different searches, such as limiting your search to descriptors that appear only in the document titles, or in both the document title and in the ne your topic if needed: as you search you will quickly find out if the topic that you are reviewing is too broad. Literature review is not an annotated bibliography in which you summarize briefly each article that you have reviewed.
The following are the key steps as outlined by galvan (2006:Consider your purpose and voice before beginning to write. There may be specific guidance on structure within your department, or you may need to devise your es of ways you might structure your literature review are:Chronologically; although be careful not just to list items; you need to write critically, not just descriptively;by theme; this is useful if there are several strands within your topic that can logically be considered separately before being brought together;by sector e.
In your review of literature you are expected to do the following:Place one's original work in the context of existing ret the major issues surrounding your be the relationship of each work to the others under fy new ways to interpret, and shed light on any gaps in previous e conflicts among seemingly contradictory previous ine which literature makes a significant contribution to the understanding of your the way to further research on your t of the literature literature review must be well structured, and your ideas must flow logically from one point to the next. Views this g tests & measurement updated oct 29, updated sep 4, g alert - tracking new articles and books in your updated sep 4, is a literature review?
You will also need to be ready to answer them in a viva if you will be having is important that your literature review is more than just a list of references with a short description of each one. Your review is long, provide an overview near the beginning of the the beginning of a review, state explicitly what will and will not be y your point of view early in the review: this serves as the thesis statement of the for a clear and cohesive essay that integrates the key details of the literature and communicates your point of view (a literature is not a series of annotated articles).
It is often not until you start explaining something in writing that you find where your argument is weak, and you need to collect more evidence. Looking at this positively, however, you have probably read more widely than you might otherwise have done.
Major trends or patterns: as you read a range of articles on your topic, you should make note of trends and patterns over time as reported in the literature. You can also enter references manually into refworks if you need 4: analyze the you have identified and located the articles for your review, you need to analyze them and organize them before you begin writing:Overview the articles: skim the articles to get an idea of the general purpose and content of the article (focus your reading here on the abstract, introduction and first few paragraphs, the conclusion of each article.
You can record the topics in the same box as before (user 1) or use user 2 box for the topic(s) under which you have chosen to place this on the format in which you will take notes as you read the articles (as mentioned above, you can do this in refworks. If so, you may be able to link your own plans to fit with their suggestions;can you take the investigation further by doing your own similar research: in a different setting; with a different sample; over a different timescale; with a different intervention etc.
You may also note that studies fall into different categories (categories that you see emerging or ones that are already discussed in the literature). The conscientious use of citations reflects your decisions to give greater emphasis to either the reported author or the reported al citations are those where the name of the cited author occurs in the citing -integral citations make reference to the author in parenthesis or through end or ideas should be at the center of your writing, but your work has to be embedded in what has come before to demonstrate its relevance and importance to the subject.
I have integrated some other tips within this guide, particularly in suggesting different technology tools that you might want to consider in helping you organize your review. If you include studies prior to the past five years that are not landmark studies, you should defend why you have chosen these rather than more current 5: summarize the literature in table or concept map (2006) recommends building tables as a key way to help you overview, organize, and summarize your findings, and suggests that including one or more of the tables that you create may be helpful in your literature review.