Creative thinking involves your imagination, which means you have to switch gears the problem of the discussion chapter is a problem of creative thinking and confidence, but there are some stylistic conventions and knowledge issues that complicate the task. The order of interpreting each major finding should be in the same order as they were described in your results section.
Is important that you are assertive about what you are arguing, but it is unlikely that, in a dissertation project, you will be able to be definitive in closing an established academic debate. As such, you should always approach the selection and interpretation of your findings introspectively and to think critically about the possibility of judgmental biases unintentionally entering into discussions about the significance of your work.
Every thesis needs to have discussion like elements, but they may do it in different a conventional thesis, what we call the imrad type (introduction, methods, results, discussion and conclusion) the discussion chapter appears a discrete chapter. More ideas will be presented in the study guide the art of may choose to review your draft from the standpoint of a dissertation examiner, which might involve preparing a list of questions that you want to see answered, then reading through your dissertation scribbling comments, suggestions, criticisms, and ideas in the margin.
Organize the discussion from the general to the specific, linking your findings to the literature, then to theory, then to practice [if appropriate]. There’s no one answer that can help everyone because every project is original, so i thought i would offer a few thoughts on it by way of starting a , gruba and zobel, in their book “how to write a better thesis”, describe the discussion chapter as the place where you:“… critically examine your findings in the light of the previous state of the subject as outlined in the background, and make judgments as to what has been learnt in your work”.
If appropriate, the discussion section is also where you state how the findings from your study revealed new gaps in the literature that had not been previously exposed or adequately the reader in thinking critically about issues based upon an evidence-based interpretation of findings; it is not governed strictly by objective reporting of ey thomas m. D bloggers like this:On twitter this week two people asked me for advice for starting the discussion chapter of their thesis / dissertation (i’m going to use the word thesis from now on because i am australian).
Have seen really different interesting ideas and comments on these replies on different topics of writing thesis but still i am not getting fully confidence how to write out my discussion chapter. Make suggestions for further may choose to conclude the discussion section by making suggestions for further research [this can be done in the overall conclusion of your paper].
However, for an undergraduate or master's thesis, you will probably find that you need to include most of your should write your results section in the past tense: you are describing what you have done in the result included must have a method set out in the methods section. This is a useful check on whether amalgamation of sections, or creation of further sections or sub-sections is gh this is the first piece of writing the reader comes to, it is often best to leave its preparation to last as, until then, you will not be absolutely sure what you are introducing.
Ve produced the ideas for discussion throughout my writing process because, from the very beginning, i’ve had to justify to my committee and myself that my project is valid and supportable by the textual evidence, and prove not only that my work is different from existing scholarship but also justify the need for a “new” model and methodology. Reading the acknowledgements in other dissertations in your field will give you an idea of the ways in which different kinds of help have been appreciated and ts, and figure and table contents pages will show up the structure of the dissertation.
If you choose to combine the results section and the discussion section into a single narrative, you must be clear in how you report the information discovered and your own interpretation of each of the first person is generally acceptable. It will also provide you with a framework to refer back to in your discussion chapter, when you reflect on the extent to which your research has achieved what it set out to r(s) describing methods, sources, material these chapters a straightforward description is required of how you conducted the research.
Doubt about the importance of my research and results and that make me feel more insecure abiut discussion. I have several stand-alone chapters with analysis and discussion in each, and was wondering if i needed an overall thesis discussion chapter.
A full understanding of the limitations of your research is part of a good discussion this stage, you may want to revisit your literature review, unless you submitted it as a separate submission earlier, and revise it to draw out those studies which have proven more de by summarising the implications of your findings in brief, and explain why they are important for researchers and in practice, and provide some suggestions for further may also wish to make some recommendations for practice. Conclusion and g your g a literature review | writing a research g a dissertation: the @ are here: newcastle university.
University of southern in current sity homeuniversity a-zmaps and the university us on us on us on t learning development▼ d in your g a g a a printer-friendly pdf version of this guide, click study guide addresses the task of writing a dissertation. The anatomy of an article: the discussion section: "how does the article i read today change what i will recommend to my patients tomorrow?
The discussion will always connect to the introduction by way of the research questions or hypotheses you posed and the literature you reviewed, but it does not simply repeat or rearrange the introduction; the discussion should always explain how your study has moved the reader's understanding of the research problem forward from where you left them at the end of the ey thomas m. I remember struggling with this section myself and, looking back, i believe there were two sources of first is scholarly confidence.
Statistical tests should include details of p values or confidence intervals and you don’t need to include all your primary evidence in this section, you should as a matter of good practice make it available in an appendix, to which you should refer at the relevant s of all the interview participants can be found in appendix a, with transcripts of each interview in appendix will, almost inevitably, find that you need to include some slight discussion of your results during this section. Sometimes your professor will encourage you to expand your discussion of the results in this way, while others don’t care what your opinion is beyond your efforts to interpret the , beth.
Organization and the following sequential points in mind as you organize and write the discussion section of your paper:Think of your discussion as an inverted pyramid. Context; can be difficult to identify the best order for sections in this chapter because the rationale for your choice of specific research question can be complicated, and there may be several inter-linked reasons why the research is needed.